Rivers of Yorkshire

When I think about the locations of towns and cities in Yorkshire, I tend to think in terms of the railway maps. This gives a distorted view that connects Leeds with Huddersfield and Shipley with Ilkley.

A more geographically sensible way to look at things would be to think in terms of the major rivers of Yorkshire. In school I remember learning “SUNWACD” as a mnemonic for remembering the order in which major rivers drain into the Ouse but I didn’t have a good visual picture of how they were laid out.

So this afternoon I spent some time drawing a public-transport-style map of the major rivers in Yorkshire, and settlements along them.

rivers

There’s no strong logic to which rivers and settlements I chose: they’re just based on my own knowledge and experience. Major settlements that are not associated with a major river are also marked in green. Note also that I’ve been extremely liberal with the scale and there may be some major inaccuracies here.

If you’re a Yorkshire dweller, how does this stack up with your own perception of where things are?

8 Comments

  1. John Avocado (@SuperCroup)
    Jun 2, 2014

    This is really lovely, and really interesting to see a different way that towns and cities are connected, besides railways and roads.

    I would say, though, that I’m uncomfortable with seeing Beverley sitting on the River Hull, but perhaps because I grew up in East Yorks, and it was drummed into us that Beverley doesn’t have a river. I suppose it’s true that the Hull doesn’t run through the centre of Beverley (probably applies to many other towns on here too), but probably close enough to be considered as a transport route between Hull and Beverley.

    • Rich
      Jun 2, 2014

      Yeah. I lived in Beverley and never felt like it had a river either. But if you look on a map it’s right there. The river is 1 mile from the railway station or the Minster so it definitely counts as being associated with the town in a way that rivers are not associated with Bradford (Aire?) and Pocklington (Derwent).

  2. Tim
    Jun 4, 2014

    That’s a neat idea, certainly.

    In my day(TM) it was `CAWNUST’. Make of this what you may.

    Compared to my view of the place, looking at the distances from Selby to Tadcaster and from Bradford to Dewsbury and Halifax, it looks like you have a bit of barrel-distortion centred on Leeds. Well, that’s fair enough too ;)

    • Rich
      Jun 4, 2014

      Not sure it’s centred on Leeds – it’s more a result of following the rivers rather than looking too hard at how settlements on other rivers are placed nearby. North Yorkshire is seriously shrunken because it has fewer major settlements, for example.

  3. Mark
    Jul 23, 2014

    The Humber starts at the confluence of the Ouse and Trent, not the Ouse and Don

    • Rich
      Jul 23, 2014

      That’s true. I was applying a little poetic licence.

      The Don does join the Ouse at Goole and the Ouse is technically still called the Ouse until it joins the Trent about 6 miles later, but this confluence doesn’t happen on the Yorkshire side of the river so I didn’t label the distinction. There are similar poetic adjustments made elsewhere on the map.

      • Rich
        Jul 23, 2014

        Something I didn’t know until now is that the confluence of the Don and the Ouse at Goole is man-made. Prior to the 1620s the Don joined the Trent and it was diverted to join the Ouse instead.

  4. John Ledger
    Nov 5, 2014

    This page is really interesting, really like your map ideas. Mapmaking is increasingly becoming a central part of my own (art) work. Coming from Barnsley, I’m really interested in both this location and on ideas of how it could function better. Really liked Owen Hatherley’s writings about the ‘hypothetical West Riding Metropolis.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>